Ruminations on the Future of Newspapers

When by happenstance Nicholas Kristof of the New York Times became my 10,000th follower on Twitter, I made a little joke about it; he kindly reciprocated and also asked me about he future of newspapers.
 
I don't have a crystal ball, but I do have a perspective coming from 30 years of watching disruptive innovation via  information technology overturn old industries and give rise to new ones.
 
Newspapers as we've known them are doomed. The conditions which supported their business model have disappeared. This is sad for people in the business and those who love newspapers, but it would be a giant mistake to equate the death of newspaper with the death of journalism. This kind of over-identification obscures important questions of how journalism will be reinvented in the Internet era, and what kinds business models will sustain it.
 
Nothing is certain, but appetite for news continues to grow. Firms do make money using the Internet. We are in a fertile period of experimentation out of which it seems likely to me, workable new forms for reporting the news will emerge.
 
If experience is a guide, opportunities are more likely to be seized and defined by startups than incumbents. This theme was identified by Clay Cristensen in "The Innovator's Dilemma" and holds true in this case. New cost structures, new use of tools and infrastructure, new ideas about what content bundles are meaningful will all play a major role in what emerges,
 
It's a difficult and painful time for those in an industry which is failing, and an exciting time for new entrants.

Comments (17)

Jun 28, 2009
 said...
good post
I am working on a presentation for school administrators and am pointing out many parallels between schools and newspapers. I think schools as we know them are obsolete and likely doomed.
Jun 28, 2009
 said...
forgot to say that I am going to quote you in the presentation- thanks so much!
Jun 28, 2009
JoeCronley said...
I'm a print advertising refugee suffering the same demise.Schools are a bad analogy,newspapers aren't supported by taxes
Jun 28, 2009
 said...
agree schools are not analogous to print media but there are many parallels- and there are many schools that are not supported by taxes - they are my audience. The non-public schools will change first.
Jun 28, 2009
Grigori Milov said...
For me it is weird that peope in newspaper business don't want to experiment with some new things. This unwilliness to experiment or change is exactly what makes newpapers doomed.
Jun 28, 2009
SherryArtBlog said...
Around 1996 the Newspaper Association had their annual meeting in San Francisco and all the Sulzbergers of the world spoke and had NO clue what the Internet would mean. Eventually they tried things but as you say, innovators will make the new model. Here's an idea: Charge Twitter users a fraction of a cent for posts they follow. Have journalists (and people with 'commercial' accounts) receive income based on followers.
Jun 28, 2009
My hope is that underground media will rise and form new competitors to major newspapers, to reinstate freedom of the press from PR/marketing type influences
Jun 28, 2009
Ben Donikian said...
As a public school teacher, I can tell you that its not so much the schools that are threatened (except perhaps those in the state legislatures that want to privatize education by withholding funds), but the way kids learn has DEFINITELY changed, and schools must adapt, and truly engage them; the next 5 years will be crucial in determining the strength or weakening of the system.
Jun 28, 2009
 said...
I am a former public school teacher, have been a public school parent and have consulted with public schools so I appreciate the dedication and talent of many ps teachers- the trouble is the effective teachers, teams, departments and schools are little wheels and sadly the little wheels never seem to make a difference to the big wheels- the districts, the state departments of ed and the legislatures. The public system is just too big for authentic over-all, transformation. Just as newspapers can't or won't change, and for some of the same reasons, public schools probably won't change. We need a reset and it's happening in pockets all across the country.
Jun 28, 2009
shanen0 said...
Mostly stating the obvious without offering a solution? How about "reverse auction charity shares" as an alternative business model for journalism (and open source software)?

As regards the newspapers, I've concluded that their apparent assets of integrity and credibility never really existed. The entire notion of 'scientific' objective journalism was a relatively short-term delusion, and now we are moving back to the traditional model of people primarily paying for more evidence of what they already want to believe. In competitive terms, I think that's disadvantageous, so the long-term advantages will shift to those societies that do foster relatively closer relationships with objective (scientific?) reality.

Jun 28, 2009
MrUnexpectedly said...
The conflation of the newspaper/journalist problem is pretty worn by now. The collapse of an industry says nothing about the collapse of a skill, talent, or artform that helped that industry thrive, or thrived off that industry.

The pressure is on for journalists. In some ways, they're lucky, as they are ahead of the curve: pressure is coming to all sorts of people who have done their jobs competently, but have hidden behind industries unprepared for the (now) dual thrust of ravenous technology and a withering global economy. Technology's relentless march is one challenge; "capitalism"'s relentless failure another. It's going to get tougher to outperform on the job for all of us.

Jun 29, 2009
GPackwood said...
Most U-Student Newspapers ARE tax-supported and that is where the end of creativity begins. uwire.com may change that.
Jun 29, 2009
rayhiltz said...
Reporting the news is what Twitter does well, reporting on the news is what journalists to do better; via blogs or paper
Jun 29, 2009
NCStockGuy said...
Best outcome would be a new system that results in more objective coverage, rather than ratings and commercial debasement
Jun 29, 2009
NCStockGuy said...
A danger is that only well educated people will have access to news that is honest with integrity, and the majority will continue to get infotainment or manipulative drivel.
Jul 05, 2009
mediahuddle said...
We need to separate out journalism (which can continue to be practiced by nonprofits) from publishing, which will need to migrate online and monetize. Since advertising revenue alone is not enough to produce a margin, a variety of revenue streams will need to be created. But instead of publishers trying to guess which model will work best, why not leverage the interactive power of the web to solve the problem. A user-centric model that offers readers a choice of Many Ways to Pay would collect every available dollar. That's the model behind http://www.PayCheckr.com.
Jul 10, 2009

Leave a comment...

 
To leave a comment on this posterous, please login by clicking one of the following.
Posterous-login     Connect     twitter

About